URBAN
RESILIENCE
HUB

What is urban resilience?

The measurable ability of any urban system, with its inhabitants, to maintain continuity through all shocks and stresses, while positively adapting and transforming toward sustainability. From earthquakes to flooding, rapid immigration to cyber-attacks, all cities face a range of shocks and stresses, natural and human-made. Today, cities and city inhabitants are facing additional and amplified challenges as a result of rapid urbanization, a changing climate and political instability, among others.
more
×

What is Urban Resilience?

 

“the measurable ability of any urban system, with its inhabitants, to maintain continuity through all shocks and stresses, while positively adapting and transforming toward sustainability.”

 

From earthquakes to flooding, rapid immigration to cyber-attacks, all cities face a range of shocks and stresses, natural and human-made. Today, cities and city inhabitants are facing additional and amplified challenges as a result of rapid urbanization, a changing climate and political instability, among others.

 

“A resilient city assesses, plans and acts to prepare for and respond to all hazards – sudden and slow-onset, expected and unexpected.”

 

By doing so, resilient cities are better able to protect and enhance people’s lives, secure development gains, foster an investible environment, and drive positive change.

Unplanned cities are more vulnerable to shock as they often have pre-existing stresses. In cities that are not prepared or unable to recover, shocks can intensify existing stresses or even create a cascade of negative impact that compromise city functionality and put people at risk.

Risks are increasing and so is the urban population, urban resilience has therefore gained greater prominence over the past decade in international development discourse and has emerged as one of the core principles of sustainable urban development in the global development frameworks and targets, including:

  • Sustainable Development Goals
  • New Urban Agenda
  • Paris Agreement on Climate Change
  • Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030.


Smart Cities: Why One Size Does Not Fit All

By Rajashree Ghosh
read more

Food for thought

×

Smart Cities: Why One Size Does Not Fit All

The Habitat III Conference’s New Urban Agenda provides for a “paradigm shift” for pursuing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The new call for “safe, resilient, sustainable and inclusive cities” remains path highly dependent technology and corporate managerial solutions (e.g. smart cities), and institutional frameworks that often are not relevant to the particular city.

(source: 123RF)

Social policy frameworks guide public interventions - the overarching principles are social justice, equity and a general understanding that it is good for all. There is a certain universal appeal to it. This is not to say that policy takes care of all the public concerns but it approximates a package representing the idea that all concerns can be addressed within the framework. Some policy narratives are stronger and others leave the door open for amendments.

In exploring “ideal types” and “best practices” what tends to happen is that frameworks get adapted physically and conceptually in another location and often for varied communities and concerns. Developed for one set of situations, it gets customized with some minor additions. Once a practice has been established as a success, there is tendency to replicate it.

The “smart cities” paradigm if one may call it, is one such example.  The idea behind smart cities is that it supports cities through real-time connected technologies, market and policy. While definitions are fleeting, the basic features are that it is a designation given to a city that incorporates information and communication technologies (ICT) to enhance the quality and performance of urban services such as energy, transportation and utilities in order to reduce resource consumption, wastage and overall costs. The overriding aim, of a smart city it is said, is to enhance the quality of living for its citizens through smart technology.

Rapid urbanization around the world has given rise to overriding business solutions to overcrowding, slums and squatter, water and sanitation, health access and delivery, safety and violence against women and children. Cities around the world are desperate for innovative methods to solve these urban challenges. E-governance and data driven decision making assist in procuring data on citizens that helps with administration and information. The data can benefit planning urban environments and provide early warning and advice on disaster and recovery issues on a city-wide scale. As part of the urban resilience strategies (DRR) smart cities can impact disaster mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery.

Smart planning has emerged as an alternative that seeks to integrate huge amount of data in order to get key knowledge for decision making in rapid and responsive manner. The buzzword is “connect,” where citizens share their information with the understanding that they are being responsible, law abiding constituents.

Further lists of definitions of smart cities are available, each from the particular partial position of who defines it. They tend to be more data driven if provided by a technology company. Governments tend to word it in a way that makes it the best possible option for administration.

From the point of view of an ordinary citizen, the understanding of “smart” initiatives is based on lived experiences as a consumer. A surveyconducted among people using smart schemes in the United Kingdom illustrates that there is more understanding and interest when respondents were questioned about specific initiatives. When asked which smart city features were deemed to be the most useful, those initiatives that provide a real-life benefit that people can easily relate to were rated the highest: smart water (89 per cent), smart construction (85 per cent), smart energy (81 per cent) and smart health (79 per cent). Features considered the least useful were smart tourism and leisure (59 per cent), smart retail (57per cent) and smart finance (57 per cent).

As a concept and in practice many cities have scaled up in random and unsystematic ways. Globally, as cities replicate each other in becoming “smart,” data collection has become an all-consuming activity. In the Netherlands, cities have taken measures to record behavior on streets through wi-fi trackers, cameras and microphones that send alerts to police officers. Masa Galic, a researcher on privacy in the public space for the Tilburg Institute of Law, Technology and Society laments that visitors enter laboratory like conditions without advance knowledge. In the particular case of Stratumseind which has the smartest streets in the Netherlands, data collected is used to profile its own citizens. Even though this is subject to data protection law by virtue of being a “smart” city this experiment to actively target people is overruled.

Across the globe in India, smart city initiatives have taken on hard wiring to another extreme. As part of initiating the smart processes the government has made it mandatory for every citizen to be assigned unique identification numbers which is presented in what is called the “Adhaar card.” Modelled after the social security number in United States (though they are significantly different), the card authenticates a person through the use of biometrics. This number is linked to a person’s bank details, purchase, travel and income tax filing. The government can also share user data “in the interest of national security,” a term that remains dangerously undefined.

The global surge in smart technology especially in urban living renders a set of familiar expectations irrespective of country or community. In other words, most cities begin to look and feel the same. The uniqueness with respect to peoples, customs, geography, climate and the essence is overridden to make way for “sameness” as Aaron Renn reported. In similar vein Schwindt lamented about the inevitability of sameness in the case of United States, ‘when you’re taking a broad view of a country in which nearly 326 million people are strewn across 3.8 million square miles. A country which is connected by the light-speed of the internet and hundreds of millions of people looking at Instagram photos of bistros in Nashville, in Los Angeles, in Brooklyn, and going, “I want that.”’

In wanting “that” the urban experience exacerbates existing inequities. Urbanization in developed countries has had a particular history. The density of population, those that are shelter-deprived and governments that are aping the West so as to keep up and thereby develop megacities by segregating populations. In India by creating Special Investment Region, the government is able to take control of land for the sake of national development. The city of Dholera is a classic case in India. It being developed as a smart city. While construction of mega infrastructures is underway, vast low-lying areas are prone to flooding. About 40,000 people live in the area that loses 1 centimeter of coastline to the sea every day. Farming has been the mainstay of populations in the region. The life and living of those communities are threatened as a result of heightened construction and have now joined hands with grassroots activists to protest those changes. This is an example of smart city policy that ends up exacerbating inequities and undermine communities.

What can the solutions be?

Smart city planning could play a relevant role in considering capabilities for data collection, information processing, real-time monitoring and networked infrastructure management. It is becoming more common to develop synergies between disciplines and approaches to consider adaption and mitigation side by side. City planners need to link climate-change issues to broader areas of concern. Conversations about whether to invest in a more efficient urban space (as in the Dholera example) and connect it to concerns about the cost of energy and localized impacts on sustainable land use and community ownership. Residents could have greater security of tenure and experience less distress and loss of wealth if the risks of decline are mitigated. It is clear that inadequate infrastructure systems make it increasingly difficult to respond to severe weather events. And cities recognize the importance of replacing water, power, transportation health care but the idea is not cause further disruption to at-risk populations – living along coastline. In effect disaster, risk recovery (DRR) needs further augmented with multiple facets of urban policy such as social, physical and environmental resources.

Circling back, a contextual approach would be most appropriate when determining specific tools and communities. Social policy will have to look inward and following some introspection provide impactful data on community approaches that are more inclusive. An example is “placemaking.” Communities have a stake in the space – public and private and want to shape it in ways that are meaningful. Their rights to their place needs to find a pivotal role in governance narrative. An inventory of local assets, practices is available to communities which can become a become a part of the stock taking. There is enough data on community trajectories that would help cities develop and implement place-based investments and policies to address isolation especially for vulnerable members. In the end, it is members of the community who can lend voice and visibility to policy. A blanket framework needs to give way to context-based and community owned approach that are not necessarily providing a universal formula for success.

Rajashree Ghosh
Resident Scholar; Womens Studies Research Center

Resilience Pills

Programa de Cooperació Barcelona – Maputo

Barcelona Resilience Week 2018 Highlights

Highlights World Cities Day 2018 in Barcelona.

New Resilience Challenges - Barcelona Resilience Week [Workshop]

Towards Sustainable and Resilient Cities - Barcelona Resilience Week 2018

Building resilience with CityRAP

Barcelona's Climate Plan with Irma Ventayol, Barcelona City Council [ENG]

SDG11 Progress 2018

UN-Habitat Executive Director on resilience

Shocks and stresses on the sustainability of settlements

Interview: Esteban Leon on Development-Humanitarian nexus

Barcelona facing climate change

Mayor of Maputo, David Simango, on city-to-city cooperation

Principles for co-production

Cape Town Drought - Alderman Ian Neilson, Executive Deputy Mayor City of Cape Town

Local Government Resilience Programme Jordan

'We Live Here Together' - A short film about creating a sustainable & inclusive urban future

Entrevista a Amaia Celaya

Ron Dembo - Citizen Roles in Resilient Cities

Sembrando Resiliencia

Urban Resilience Hub by UN-Habitat

New Urban Agenda Interview Corner - Christin Kristoffersen (Arctic Cities)

New Urban Agenda Interview Corner - Dan Lewis (UN-Habitat)

Yakutsk mayor interview

Resilient Cities Series: Interview with Mayor of Asuncion, Mario Ferreiro

Resilient Cities Series: Full interview with Mayor of Maputo

Talking Resilience with staff from Maputo City Council

Building Urban Resilience in Maputo

The metropolitan scale of Resilience

Resilient Cities Series: Full interview with Mayor of Yakutsk (Russia)

+
more on our YT channel

Partnerships

We forge partnerships with all the major actors working on urban resilience, including donors, local governments and their networks, humanitarian organizations, UN agencies and academia. One of our chief aims is to bring more cohesion and understanding around urban resilience thinking, in particular to local governments across the world. Partnerships therefore represent a significant advancement toward achieving that goal.
Medellin Collaboration
for Urban Resilence
Global Alliance
for Urban Crises
RESCCUE
Risk Nexus
Initiative
Urban Resilience Institute
Making Cities Resilient
Campaign

City Profiles

Asunción
Barcelona
Maputo
Yakutsk
×
×

The Agenda

×

Careers

All vacancies are posted on the UN’s recruitment portal, INSPIRA. Spontaneous candidacies should be sent here office@cityresilience.org.

UN-Habitat regularly works with volunteering through the Online Volunteering Platform.

For all internship opportunities, please consult the UN’s recruitment portal, INSPIRA.

Consult our Legacy List to find out who has directly supported UN-Habitat’s urban resilience work.


Find our latest vacancies here!


INSPIRA
UNV
×

The Library

Annual Report 2018

English2018

Infrastructure Improvement Enhancer

English 2019

Guide to the City Resilience Profiling Tool

Russian2019

Climate Action Enhancer

Russian2019

Barcelona Resilience Week 2018 Report

English2018

Data Speak Louder Than Words

English2018

Human Rights Enhancer

English2018

Supporting Housing Reconstruction After Disaster

English2018

Resource Efficiency Enhancer

English2018

Social Resilience Guide

English2018

Working Towards More Resilient Cities

English2018

Guide to the City Resilience Profiling Tool

English2018

Progress on MCSR action 2

English2018

Informality Action Enhancer

English2018

World Cities Day 2018

English2018

Annual Report 2017

English2018

Local Governments’ Pocket Guide to Resilience

English2015

Press Kit – French

French2017

Press Kit – Spanish

Spanish2018

Progress on MCSR action 1

English2018

Making Cities Sustainable & Resilient

English2018

Climate Action Enhancer

English2018

Gender Equality Enhancer

English2018

Urban Resilience Flyer

English2017

Press Kit

English2017

City Resilience Profiling Programme volume 8

English

City Resilience Profiling Programme volume 7

English

City Resilience Profiling Programme volume 6

English

City Resilience Profiling Programme volume 5

English

City Resilience Profiling Programme World Urban Forum

English 2014

City resilience profiling programme Volume 3

English 2014

City Resilience Profiling Programme Volume 2

English2013

City Resilience Profiling Programme

English2012

Highlights 2017

English2017

How Resilient is your City

English2017

City Resilience Profiling Program – Volume 9

English2017

City Resilience Profiling Programme – Habitat III Special Edition

English2017

City Resilience Profiling Programe – Volume 11

English2017

Trends in Urban Resilience 2017

English2017

Contact us

Send

For all inquiries, please contact us at: info@cityresilience.org

Urban Resilience Programme
UN-Habitat
c/Sant Antoni Maria Claret, 167
08025 - Barcelona, Spain

Implementing
With the support of